{"id":915,"date":"2013-09-12T21:53:09","date_gmt":"2013-09-12T11:53:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/?p=915"},"modified":"2013-09-12T21:55:36","modified_gmt":"2013-09-12T11:55:36","slug":"dictionary-of-environment-and-conservation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/?p=915","title":{"rendered":"Dictionary of Environment and Conservation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/09\/park.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-923\" alt=\"park\" src=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/09\/park-300x181.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"181\" srcset=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/09\/park-300x181.jpg 300w, http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/09\/park.jpg 480w, http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/09\/park-290x175.jpg 290w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a> <strong>Rating:<\/strong> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/star-rating-for-reviews\/images\/star.png\" alt=\"&#9733;\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/star-rating-for-reviews\/images\/star.png\" alt=\"&#9733;\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/star-rating-for-reviews\/images\/star.png\" alt=\"&#9733;\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/star-rating-for-reviews\/images\/halfstar.png\" alt=\"&frac12;\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/star-rating-for-reviews\/images\/blankstar.png\" alt=\"&#9734;\" \/><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ukcatalogue.oup.com\/product\/9780199641666.do#.UjGkWn9jEk_\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Chris Park and Michael Allaby. 2013. Oxford Dictionary of Environment and Conservation.2e. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978 0 19 964166 6. <\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This isn&#8217;t the first dictionary I&#8217;ve ever reviewed and I think it&#8217;s important that I continue because they need to be publicised, but there are certain inherent problems. Firstly, it&#8217;s a dictionary &#8211; what are you expecting? Normally, I can go through chapters, making points linking ideas and generally trying my best to highlight what I see as key features and concepts flowing through the work. If I say that the opening chapter looks at words beginning with A, by C I&#8217;ve lost my readers and possibly my freedom if anyone hears me talking whilst writing which I often do! Secondly, there&#8217;s almost the fin-de-siecle feeling about a dictionary &#8211; isn&#8217;t that what Google&#8217;s for? Well, actually, no and here are 6 reasons I prefer this book over the internet (fully accepting the irony of condemning that which I am using !):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>If you&#8217;re lucky (and this one seems to follow the rule), human editors have made a rational selection about what to include\/exclude. Even luckier, terms will have a similar level of understanding required so it&#8217;s not a case of a complex issue next to something everyone knows. This is harder than it looks and\u00a0 few dictionaries manage it but here we seem to have fairly good agreement;<\/li>\n<li>You don&#8217;t always need to know the exact word or spelling because there might well be a similar term close by or you&#8217;re spelling is close enough to get you to the word. The problem with computer search terms is you only get what you ask for (yes, there&#8217;s autocorrect but that&#8217;s another ballgame all together!);<\/li>\n<li>You can practice the art of procrastination through learning. Go on, admit it, how many of you have tried to read a dictionary from A to Z? I look up a word I know and get drawn in to those I didn&#8217;t and before long I&#8217;ve expanded my vocabulary even if it&#8217;s cost me 20 minutes (and time well spent);<\/li>\n<li>You can craft a framework of understanding through it. If you have the language of the science then you can start to appreciate how ideas fit together.;<\/li>\n<li>You&#8217;re students aren&#8217;t digital natives, whatever Prensky said (and he later recanted!). Yes, they&#8217;ve got all the iToys and use Facebook as a way of existence but word documents and spreadsheets might be foreign objects. They only know a subset of what is on the web and so this helps them learn some solid ideas from an edited source;<\/li>\n<li>It can be an education aid &#8211; you&#8217;ve seen one, now build your own! It provides a scaffold for beginners to see which parts of ecological language they need to be familiar with and it&#8217;s the start of their personal glossaries.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I could always argue that by being lightweight and portable they can work anywhere, don&#8217;t need recharging and don&#8217;t require vast amounts of energy to turn a page (whatever the younger reader might say!). The original low-carbon footprint (especially if the pulp is from sustainable timber). Apart from that, this is a great dictionary of key terms which will help numerous readers start to master the increasinlgy complex world of ecological and environmental sciences.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rating: Chris Park and Michael Allaby. 2013. Oxford Dictionary of Environment and Conservation.2e. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978 0 19 964166 6. This isn&#8217;t the first dictionary I&#8217;ve ever reviewed and I think it&#8217;s important that I continue because they need to be publicised, but there are certain inherent problems. Firstly, it&#8217;s a dictionary &#8211; what are you expecting? Normally, I can go through chapters, making points linking ideas and generally trying my best to highlight what I see as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":923,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[31,143],"class_list":["post-915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-review","tag-conservation","tag-environment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/915"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=915"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/915\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":928,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/915\/revisions\/928"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecogeog.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}